Trump’s executive orders targeting DEI programs reinstated by appeals court
WATCH: President Trump takes questions before boarding AF1
President Donald Trump answered questions from reporters at Joint Base Andrews before boarding Air Force One to depart for Mar-a-Lago this weekend. Trump briefly spoke about the ceasefire negotiations between Ukraine and Russia before answering questions on other topics. "We've had some pretty good news coming out of Russia," Trump said. "We're hearing good things, who knows, but we're hearing good things."
WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court on Friday handed the Trump administration a legal victory, allowing the enforcement of executive orders restricting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
The decision lifts a nationwide injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson, who previously ruled that Trump’s orders were likely unconstitutional. While the appeals court judges noted potential First Amendment concerns, they found that blocking the orders entirely went too far.
The lawsuit, filed by Baltimore city officials and advocacy groups, challenges Trump’s efforts to eliminate federal DEI funding. The case is expected to continue in the courts.
What did Trump’s executive orders change?
The backstory:
Trump signed his first executive order on DEI on his first day back in office, directing federal agencies to terminate equity-related grants and contracts. A follow-up order required federal contractors to certify that they do not promote DEI programs.
The city of Baltimore, diversity officers, professors, and restaurant worker groups sued the administration, arguing the orders unconstitutionally limit speech and overstep presidential authority. Judge Abelson, a Biden nominee, ruled that the orders lacked a clear definition of DEI and would have a chilling effect on speech.
The Trump administration defended the orders, saying they only target DEI initiatives that violate civil rights laws and align federal spending with Trump’s policy priorities.
What did the court decide?
The other side:
A three-judge panel from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction, allowing Trump’s orders to be enforced while the case moves forward.
US President Donald Trump steps off Air Force One as he arrives at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida, on March 14, 2025. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Judge Pamela Harris, an Obama appointee, wrote that while the orders could raise concerns over free speech, the lower court’s nationwide block was too broad. The panel included two Obama appointees and one Trump appointee.
What’s next for DEI programs?
Big picture view:
The ruling marks a significant legal victory for Trump, who has faced multiple lawsuits challenging his executive orders since returning to office. However, the case is still active, meaning further legal challenges could alter enforcement.
Trump’s push to eliminate federal support for DEI programs is part of a broader Republican movement that argues these initiatives undermine merit-based hiring and education. Supporters of DEI policies counter that they help institutions serve diverse populations and address systemic inequality.
With legal battles ongoing, the future of DEI policies under federal funding remains uncertain.
The Source: This story was reported from Los Angeles. It is based on information from The Associated Press, detailing the appeals court’s decision, legal arguments, and ongoing challenges to Trump’s DEI executive orders.