Arizona, 2 other states propose water cuts from Colorado River
WASHINGTON - Arizona, California and Nevada on Monday proposed a plan to significantly reduce their water use from the drought-stricken Colorado River over the next three years, a potential breakthrough in a year-long stalemate that pitted Western states against one another.
The plan would conserve an additional 3 million acre-feet of water through 2026, when current guidelines for how the river is shared expire. About half the cuts would come by the end of 2024. That’s less than what federal officials said last year would be needed to stave off crisis in the river amid a years-long drought, but still marks a notable step in drawn-out and difficult negotiations between the three states.
The 1,450-mile (2,334-kilometer) river provides water to 40 million people in seven states in the U.S. West, parts of Mexico and more than two dozen Native American tribes. It’s responsible for producing hydropower and supplying water to farms that grow most of the nation’s winter vegetables.
In exchange for temporarily using less water, cities, irrigation districts and Native American tribes in the three states will receive federal funding, though officials did not say how much money they expected to receive.
Though adoption of the plan isn’t certain, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Camille Touton called it an "important step forward." She said the bureau will pull back its proposal from last month that could have resulted in sidestepping the existing water priority system to force cuts as it analyzes the three-state plan. The bureau’s earlier proposal, if adopted, could have led to a messy and drawn-out legal battle.
The three states — which form the Lower Basin — are entitled to 7.5 million acre-feet of water altogether from the river. An acre-foot of water is roughly enough to serve two to three U.S. households annually.
Arizona, other states reach deal on Colorado River water use
Arizona, along with other states, have reached a deal to end a one-year-old stalemate over water allotment cuts from the Colorado River water. The proposal will, at least for now, help keep two major reservoirs on the river from drying up, and will also help put off an impending water crisis. FOX 10's Nicole Garcia reports.
California gets the most, based on a century-old water rights priority system. Most of that goes to farmers in the Imperial Irrigation District, though some also goes to smaller water districts and cities across Southern California. Arizona and Nevada have already faced cuts to their supply in recent years as key reservoir levels dropped based on prior agreements. But California has been spared.
Under the new proposal, California would give up about 1.6 million acre-feet of water through 2026 — a little more than half of the total. That’s roughly the same amount the state first offered six months ago. It wasn’t clear why the other states agreed to a deal now when California didn’t offer further cuts. Leaders in Arizona and Nevada didn’t immediately say how they’d divide the other 1.4 million acre-feet.
Tom Buschatzke, director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources, stressed that the announcement is not a final deal.
"We agreed to a proposal. This is not an agreement," Buschatzke said during a conference call with reporters. "This is critical to the understanding of what we’ve done here."
Buschatzke said the proposal still needs analysis and approval from the federal government, which will determine how much funding will be allocated for entities that give up water.
In a statement Monday, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs said the deal provided a way to "build our reservoirs back up in the near-term," but added that work remained to address the long-term effects of climate change and overallocation.
TOPSHOT - A "bathtub ring" is visible at sunset during low water levels the Lake Mead reservoir due to the western drought on July 19, 2021 as seen from the Hoover Dam on the Colorado River at the Nevada and Arizona state border. (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California and Joe Lombardo of Nevada also praised the agreement, emphasizing the work of their individual states to get to Monday’s plan.
The Colorado River has been in crisis for years due to a multi-decade drought in the West intensified by climate change, rising demand and overuse. Those pressures have sent water levels at key reservoirs along the river to unprecedented lows, though they have rebounded somewhat thanks to heavy precipitation and deep snowpack this winter.
In recent years, the river’s woes have forced the federal government to cut some water allocations, and to offer up billions of dollars to pay farmers, cities and others to cut back. But key water officials didn’t see those efforts as enough to prevent the system from collapsing.
Last summer, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation called for the seven Colorado River basin states to figure out how to cut their collective use of the river’s water by about 2 to 4 million acre-feet in 2023 alone — or roughly 15% to 30% of their annual use — but states blew past that deadline and an agreement remained elusive for several more months.
In April, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation released a plan that considered two ways to force cuts in the Colorado River supply for Arizona, Nevada and California, which make up the river’s Lower Basin.
As Arizona looks to desalination as a drought solution, questions mount over its feasibility for the state
As Arizona officials look at desalination, or the process of creating freshwater by removing salt from saltwater, as a way to solve the state's water crisis, there are also mounting questions over whether such ways to create water can even work for the Grand Canyon State, which has no access to the ocean.
One contemplated using a decades-old water priority system to reduce usage that would have benefited California and some Native American tribes with senior water rights. The other would have been a percentage cut across the board.
Michael Cohen, a senior researcher at the Pacific Institute focused on the Colorado River, said the river’s hydrology has improved a bit since last summer. He called the amount of cuts the three states have proposed a "huge, huge lift" and a significant step forward.
"It does buy us a little additional time," he said. But if more dry years are ahead, "this agreement will not solve that problem."
Associated Press writers Ken Ritter in Las Vegas and Amy Taxin in Orange County contributed.